In his insightful work “Making Social Spending Work,” Peter Lindert underscores the necessity of safety nets in societies to support individuals facing various challenges such as initial disadvantages, past errors, or economic hardships. An exemplary policy achievement in recent years involves the transformation of India’s subsidy system, benefiting 100 million citizens through direct benefit transfers, thereby enhancing social security measures. However, India’s conventional trade union stance which prioritizes job preservation over job creation tends to favor older workers at the expense of the younger generation. This has hindered the efficacy of work-related social security initiatives. Consequently, a mere fraction of India’s vast labor force, approximately 7.5%, and a minimal percentage of its numerous enterprises contribute to monthly social security schemes. To address this issue, we propose a series of reforms to enhance the Employee Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), focusing on efficiency, choice, competition, effectiveness, and sustainability. These reforms are crucial as India’s primary labor market challenge lies not in employment generation but in ensuring fair wages.
In his insightful work “Making Social Spending Work,” Peter Lindert underscores the necessity of safety nets in societies to support individuals facing various challenges such as initial disadvantages, past errors, or economic hardships. An exemplary policy achievement in recent years involves the transformation of India’s subsidy system, benefiting 100 million citizens through direct benefit transfers, thereby enhancing social security measures. However, India’s conventional trade union stance which prioritizes job preservation over job creation tends to favor older workers at the expense of the younger generation. This has hindered the efficacy of work-related social security initiatives. Consequently, a mere fraction of India’s vast labor force, approximately 7.5%, and a minimal percentage of its numerous enterprises contribute to monthly social security schemes. To address this issue, we propose a series of reforms to enhance the Employee Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), focusing on efficiency, choice, competition, effectiveness, and sustainability. These reforms are crucial as India’s primary labor market challenge lies not in employment generation but in ensuring fair wages.
Lindert’s research indicates that nations adopt divergent approaches to public education, healthcare, pensions, and welfare, driven by their perspectives on intergenerational equity, fiscal redistribution, and human capital returns. He argues that the success of social security initiatives hinges on fiscal capacity, highlighting the under-resourcing of universal education and the disproportionate allocation of resources to the elderly, neglecting the needs of the young and impoverished. Moreover, the looming challenge of an aging population poses a significant threat to safety nets, compounded by flaws in employer-based provisions. Lindert advocates for universal welfare schemes as they offer greater equity. Unlike countries facing an aging demographic, India’s primary obstacle lies in regulatory hurdles fostering informality within its economy. Thus, we must consider swift administrative reforms to accelerate the formalization process.
Efficiency remains a pressing concern within the EPFO, characterized by exorbitant operational costs, which are ten times higher than comparable funds offered by institutions like the State Bank of India. These inflated expenses, borne predominantly by employers, effectively function as a form of taxation. The EPFO should transition into a non-profit entity with standardized costs to address this. However, its monopolistic structure perpetuates inefficiencies, akin to the “cost disease” elucidated by Nobel Laureate Bill Baumol, necessitating urgent reforms to foster competition and enhance service quality.
Introducing competition in the realm of work-linked social security payments, currently monopolized by the EPFO and Employees’ State Insurance, is imperative. This monopoly fosters subpar service, imposes financial burdens on employers, and undermines efforts to formalize the economy. Despite past proposals advocating for competition, unfounded concerns about private-sector exploitation and administrative efficacy have impeded progress. However, experiences in other sectors demonstrate the benefits of competition, underscoring the need for employee-driven choices in selecting their preferred social security provider.
Employee empowerment is crucial in reforming social security schemes. Current practices, such as mandatory deductions from salaries, disproportionately affect low-income earners and limit individual autonomy. Employees should have the freedom and choice to decide their contribution levels and allocation preferences, thereby promoting financial inclusivity and equitable participation.
The transition from lifelong employment to more transient work arrangements necessitates reforms to ensure the portability and accessibility of social security benefits. Adopting Aadhaar-linked contributions would enhance traceability and facilitate the extension of EPFO benefits to self-employed and gig workers.
Sustainability is paramount in safeguarding social security systems. The current Employee Pension Scheme (EPS) exhibits structural flaws, jeopardizing its long-term viability. Merging the EPS with a universally funded pension scheme like the Atal Pension Yojana would mitigate financial risks and enhance sustainability.
In conclusion, while aspirational objectives are integral to policymaking, pragmatic reforms are essential for effective implementation. India’s journey towards economic prosperity and social equity necessitates both sustained economic growth and administrative efficiency. Let us pursue ambitious fiscal policies while concurrently implementing pragmatic reforms to bolster employer social security programs and facilitate the transition of millions from informal to formal employment.
You might also be interested to read: Shattering the Glass Ceiling: Women Leaders Ascend to C-Suite Roles
